tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2194281064695752567.comments2014-08-17T01:41:13.173-07:00INTERMASHONAL TIMESMorten Jorgensenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00698807314133313558noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2194281064695752567.post-62190298881374869282013-07-05T02:34:56.667-07:002013-07-05T02:34:56.667-07:00nice blog, a lot of usefull info here, thanksnice blog, a lot of usefull info here, thankslenovo customer care numberhttp://customercaresupportnumber.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2194281064695752567.post-53809624506814926262011-10-11T03:18:46.162-07:002011-10-11T03:18:46.162-07:00Great personality, I like it very much.Great personality, I like it very much.Franchise litigationhttp://www.dbigmore.co.uk/franchising-disputes.htmnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2194281064695752567.post-35753432347504163122010-06-15T09:28:55.354-07:002010-06-15T09:28:55.354-07:00He is a salesman. He could sell anything. I had a ...He is a salesman. He could sell anything. I had a pad in the early 90 for e-books and stuff. Now I can use my Nokia. Do not belive the hype!Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02776757947509802916noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2194281064695752567.post-19464794372593532282010-03-18T16:18:48.220-07:002010-03-18T16:18:48.220-07:00Yeah! Sharing of culture is no threat to culture!Yeah! Sharing of culture is no threat to culture!Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09044254718587791753noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2194281064695752567.post-75154076056982942072010-03-17T08:40:24.628-07:002010-03-17T08:40:24.628-07:00I agree on the main points, Morten.
Yet the basic...I agree on the main points, Morten.<br /><br />Yet the basic argument is flawed (what concerns the online turnover vs the cd turover): Because, as long as cd sales keep falling and legal downloads keep increasing, the graphs must meet at some point. (both in absolute terms, and as now that the increase in online revenue matches the decrease in physical revenue).<br /><br />One could just as well argue that the first wave of piracy comprised those who don't care if artists get paid or not; while the second wave comprised those who do, but are pissed because the labels DON'T SUPPLY DOWNLOADS (in a reasonable fashion).<br /><br />The development of new platforms + better stores (etc.) could now have transformed a lot of the downloaders from the "second wave", plus of course generated new downloaders who never considered piracy in the first place.<br /><br />HOWEVER i agree with your bottom line: The labels lose money because they DON'T SUPPLY.<br /><br />Now someone (else) has understood that people want ACCESS. we are willing to pay for availability, speed, quality and sequrity. But people are now embracing the obvious model: subscription. <br /><br />Give med access to "all" of the music i want, on any device at any time, and I'll name a price. <br />But asking me to pay 100$ if I want to listen to 100 different songs any given week, and 1$ if I want to hear the same song on repeat is obviously ridiculous.<br /><br />Nice post!gummohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05326611619390091831noreply@blogger.com